SUM A DING WONG
3:56 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
I'd be inclined to stick with Randolph. The defences confidence is high at the moment.
Also, by keeping Randolph in (no pun intended) ;-), it will let Adrian know that he has a fight on his hands...that can only be a good thing..
|
neilalex
3:55 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
I'd put Adrian back in on the very simple assumption that he's probably the better keeper. It's not as if he's been absent through a drop in form. As someone else has said down the thread, Randolph has put down a marker and this may make Adrian less prone to the fuckwittery he sometimes demonstrates.
|
DukeofDevo
3:40 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
It strikes me that Bilics philosophy is that players have to win their place back after being out! I've got a feeling Randolph might start against City!
He's played well in all the games and saved a couple of dead certs including last night when we were only1 up!
|
13 Brentford Rd
3:32 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
Adrian is a much bigger pressence and personality which is important for keepers, plus he's been consistantly solid over a long period.
He is our number one and will go straght back into the side!
Randolph has proved in the 3 games that he is a capable back up which is what you would expect.
|
Swiss.
1:30 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
I also think Adrian is better but Randolph has shown himself to be a decent deputy. Playing him in the cup games maybe.
|
boltkunt
1:04 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
Suspect coming off his line to collect crosses, but thought he done well last night.
|
Mr Polite
12:54 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
They're not. They're back safe and sound at school.... Croe is at least 50m away and bored
|
Hammers1993
12:53 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
Alex V 12:24 Tue Sep 15
Mr Polite 12:39 Tue Sep 15
Cheers. I'm not quite sure why that croe got so angry? Didn't realise the kids were still off school.
|
Pancho
12:49 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
HAHA!
There he is.
|
i-Ron
12:49 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
*damn, I forgot to log out and log in as Nigel for that post!
|
the exile
12:49 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
True, Randolph has done nothing wrong, but all he has done is confirm that he is a worthy deputy and send a message to Adrian that he's got competition for his place. Adrian back in against City for me - you've got to show confidence in your no.1.
|
i-Ron
12:48 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
SHUT YA FUCKING FACE UP YOU MASSIVE SPAMMY FOREHEAD KENT CUNT
|
Fivetide
12:46 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
It's not that difficult for Bilic.
Play Randy against City. If he keeps a clean sheet, happy days. if we get destroyed, bringing Adrian back will appear reasonable to everyone.
|
Pancho
12:43 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
You been OD'ing on cockney cunt pills again Ronald?
|
i-Ron
12:42 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
I don't think he's a great goalie but has done well.
I think Adrian is better and should be back in.
I don't think he's a great goalie neither.
If we bought a mustard keeper I'd be well happy.
|
Pancho
12:40 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
I always preferred Mortimer.
|
Mr Polite
12:39 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
yeah i'm not quite sure what Hammers said wrong either.
|
Alex V
12:24 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
Hammers1993 11:56 Tue Sep 15
|
Mr Polite
12:23 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
It's a tough one. If Adrian was a great keeper then i'd see the logic in bringing him straight back.
He is good, but not a great, so if I were manager i'd be inclined to tell Randolph it's his place to lose. Big him up etc but tell him a drop in form will see Adrian come back.
|
Hammers1993
12:22 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
Clearly.
Which bit don't you agree with?
|
whufcroe
12:12 Tue Sep 15
Re: Randolph
|
Hammers1993 11:56 Tue Sep 15
Hahahaha
Are you for fucking real?
|
| 
